Learner Profiles
Age-appropriate design constraints for each year group. These profiles govern content language level, pedagogy approach, feedback style, and available interaction types.
Year 1
KS1 Age 5-6Content & Language
Reading level
Most children are in phonics stages 2–5. Cannot decode independently. All content must be supported by audio.
Max sentence length
8 words
Vocabulary
concrete_everyday
Text-to-speech
Required
Pedagogy
Scaffolding
maximum
Hint tiers
Up to 2
Productive failure
No — Not appropriate. Y1 children need success experiences. Move to worked example immediately on error.
Spacing
Yes (1–3 days)
Interleaving
No
Feedback
AI tone
warm_nurturing
Style
informational_celebratory
Gamification safe
No
Example (correct)
“The frog jumped exactly four spaces — you counted perfectly!”
Example (incorrect)
“Oh, let us count again together! [animation demonstrates]”
Avoid
["Wrong", "Incorrect", "That is not right", "Try again", "Well done", "Good boy/girl"]
Interaction Types (8)
Year 2
KS1 Age 6-7Content & Language
Reading level
Consolidating phonics (stages 5–6). Many can read simple sentences but decode slowly. Text should support, not replace, audio.
Lexile range
–200L
Max sentence length
10 words
Vocabulary
concrete_plus_simple_abstract
Text-to-speech
Required
Pedagogy
Scaffolding
maximum
Hint tiers
Up to 2
Productive failure
No — Not yet appropriate. Guided discovery (show the model, ask child to notice) is preferable to unguided challenge.
Spacing
Yes (1–4 days)
Interleaving
No
Feedback
AI tone
warm_encouraging
Style
informational_warm
Gamification safe
No
Example (correct)
“You heard the /ee/ sound hiding in the middle — that is tricky to spot!”
Example (incorrect)
“That is the short /u/ sound. The one we are looking for is /ee/, like in tree. Can you hear the difference?”
Avoid
["Wrong", "Incorrect", "Try again", "Well done!", "Star of the day"]
Interaction Types (13)
Year 3
KS2 Age 7-8Content & Language
Reading level
Most children are independent readers of simple texts. Reading fluency varies widely. Decoding is largely automatic for common words.
Lexile range
150–350L
Max sentence length
14 words
Vocabulary
curriculum_vocabulary_supported
Text-to-speech
Optional
Pedagogy
Scaffolding
moderate_to_high
Hint tiers
Up to 3
Productive failure
Yes — Introduce challenge problem first; expect partial or incorrect attempts. Move to worked example after child has made one or more attempts. Effect size d=0.36–0.58 (Sinha & Kapur 2021).
Spacing
Yes (2–7 days)
Interleaving
Yes
Feedback
AI tone
warm_competence_focused
Style
specific_competence
Gamification safe
No
Example (correct)
“You spotted the pattern — all the multiples of 6 end in an even number. That is a really useful thing to notice.”
Example (incorrect)
“That one got you — 7×8 trips up a lot of people. Here is a trick: 7×7 is 49, so 7×8 is just 7 more, which gives 56.”
Avoid
["Wrong", "Incorrect", "You need to improve", "Well done!", "Amazing!"]
Interaction Types (15)
Year 4
KS2 Age 8-9Content & Language
Reading level
Children are broadly fluent readers of age-appropriate fiction and non-fiction. Reading for understanding is replacing reading to decode.
Lexile range
300–500L
Max sentence length
18 words
Vocabulary
curriculum_vocabulary_established
Text-to-speech
Optional
Pedagogy
Scaffolding
moderate
Hint tiers
Up to 3
Productive failure
Yes — Full productive failure sequences appropriate. Unguided challenge → exploration → instruction → retrieval. Time on challenge: 3–5 minutes.
Spacing
Yes (2–10 days)
Interleaving
Yes
Feedback
AI tone
respectful_and_precise
Style
elaborated_competence
Gamification safe
No
Example (correct)
“Your inference was correct — the text never said the character was nervous, but you worked it out from the clues: the short sentences and the word 'paced'. That is sophisticated reading.”
Example (incorrect)
“This is a common misconception: plants do not get their food from the soil — they make it from sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide. The soil provides minerals, but food is made in the leaves.”
Avoid
["Wrong", "Incorrect", "That is not right at all", "Amazing!", "Superstar"]
Interaction Types (16)
Year 5
KS2 Age 9-10Content & Language
Reading level
Children are confident, independent readers. Can engage with non-fiction, technical, and literary texts. Reading stamina sufficient for multi-paragraph extracts.
Lexile range
450–650L
Max sentence length
22 words
Vocabulary
academic_vocabulary_supported
Text-to-speech
Optional
Pedagogy
Scaffolding
light_to_moderate
Hint tiers
Up to 4
Productive failure
Yes — Standard learning sequence. Challenge should activate prior knowledge — design problems to surface prerequisite concepts. If child has no attempt after 5 minutes, provide Tier 1 hint.
Spacing
Yes (3–14 days)
Interleaving
Yes
Feedback
AI tone
peer_like_respectful
Style
analytical_competence
Gamification safe
No
Example (correct)
“You recognised that 1/2 is larger than 2/5, and used the common denominator method correctly. The visualiser confirms it — the bar for 1/2 is noticeably longer.”
Example (incorrect)
“The reasoning does not quite hold: you said both fractions are the same because the numerator in 2/5 is double the numerator in 1/2. But the denominator changed too — the pieces got smaller. Converting to tenths: 1/2 = 5/10 and 2/5 = 4/10. Which is larger now?”
Avoid
["Wrong", "Amazing!", "Brilliant!", "That is so clever", "You are so smart"]
Interaction Types (16)
Year 6
KS2 Age 10-11Content & Language
Reading level
Children are proficient, critical readers. Can engage with complex, multi-layered texts. SATs reading-level texts typically at 700–900 Lexile.
Lexile range
600–800L
Max sentence length
25 words
Vocabulary
academic_vocabulary_independent
Text-to-speech
Optional
Pedagogy
Scaffolding
light
Hint tiers
Up to 4
Productive failure
Yes — Standard. Extend challenge phase to 5–7 minutes. Design challenges that admit multiple solution approaches — document child's approach for feedback.
Spacing
Yes (3–21 days)
Interleaving
Yes
Feedback
AI tone
intellectual_peer
Style
critical_analytical
Gamification safe
No
Example (correct)
“Your rhythmic analysis correctly identified the iambic pattern in lines 2 and 4, and you rightly noted the disruption in line 3. The question is: why might Shakespeare have broken the metre there?”
Example (incorrect)
“There is a problem with that interpretation: you suggested the character is happy at the end, but the meter becomes irregular in the final couplet — what might that irregularity signal about their emotional state?”
Avoid
["Wrong", "That is completely wrong", "Amazing!", "Brilliant!", "Superstar"]
Interaction Types (15)
Year 7
KS3 Age 11-12Content & Language
Reading level
Entry to secondary school. Reading levels vary widely due to school transitions and reading habits. Expect to encounter academic non-fiction registers regularly.
Lexile range
700–950L
Max sentence length
30 words
Vocabulary
secondary_curriculum_vocabulary
Text-to-speech
Optional
Pedagogy
Scaffolding
light
Hint tiers
Up to 4
Productive failure
Yes — Standard. Secondary challenge problems can span multiple sessions.
Spacing
Yes (3–21 days)
Interleaving
Yes
Feedback
AI tone
academic_peer
Style
academic_critical
Gamification safe
No
Example (correct)
“Correct — and the implication is worth noting: if this is true, then [connected consequence] should also hold. Does it?”
Example (incorrect)
“That reasoning has a gap: you assumed [X], but the evidence points the other way because [Y]. Revise your argument in light of that.”
Avoid
["Wrong", "Amazing", "Brilliant", "That is so clever"]
Interaction Types (13)
Year 8
KS3 Age 12-13Content & Language
Reading level
Confident secondary learner. Engages with diverse text types including primary source documents, data tables, and literary criticism.
Lexile range
850–1100L
Vocabulary
specialist_secondary_vocabulary
Text-to-speech
Optional
Pedagogy
Scaffolding
minimal
Hint tiers
Up to 3
Productive failure
Yes — Standard secondary PF. Extended exploration phase appropriate.
Spacing
Yes (5–28 days)
Interleaving
Yes
Feedback
AI tone
academic_critical
Style
academic_evaluative
Gamification safe
No
Example (correct)
“Your method is correct and your reasoning is sound. The extension question: does this generalise? Try with a different case.”
Example (incorrect)
“Your approach identifies the right method but fails at step 3. The error is [specific]. A complete answer would [what is required].”
Avoid
["Amazing", "Brilliant", "That is so clever", "Well done"]
Interaction Types (10)
Year 9
KS3 Age 13-14Content & Language
Reading level
Approaching GCSE level. Can engage with challenging texts including political speeches, scientific papers (simplified), and 19th-century prose.
Lexile range
950–1250L
Vocabulary
gcse_academic_vocabulary
Text-to-speech
Optional
Pedagogy
Scaffolding
minimal
Hint tiers
Up to 3
Productive failure
Yes — Full secondary/GCSE-prep PF. Multi-part problems appropriate. Document reasoning chains.
Spacing
Yes (7–35 days)
Interleaving
Yes
Feedback
AI tone
examination_coach
Style
gcse_exam_style
Gamification safe
No
Example (correct)
“Full marks — you addressed all three assessment objectives: identification, quotation, and analytical comment on the writer's method.”
Example (incorrect)
“This response would earn 2 of 6 marks. You identified the technique correctly (AO1 ✓) and quoted (AO2 ✓), but your analytical comment describes what happens rather than explaining the effect on the reader — that is the AO3 requirement. Revise the final sentence to explain why the technique is effective.”
Avoid
["Amazing", "Brilliant", "Well done", "That is clever"]
Interaction Types (10)
Year 10
KS4 Age 14-15Content & Language
Reading level
First year of GCSE courses. Engages with exam-board set texts, primary sources, scientific journal abstracts, and extended non-fiction. Reading is analytical and purpose-driven.
Lexile range
1000–1300L
Vocabulary
gcse_specialist_vocabulary
Text-to-speech
Optional
Pedagogy
Scaffolding
minimal
Hint tiers
Up to 3
Productive failure
Yes — Full GCSE-level productive failure. Multi-part exam questions as challenge problems. Extended exploration phase (10+ minutes) appropriate for complex problems.
Spacing
Yes (7–42 days)
Interleaving
Yes
Feedback
AI tone
examination_coach
Style
gcse_exam_analytical
Gamification safe
No
Example (correct)
“Full marks. You addressed all assessment objectives: identification (AO1), textual evidence (AO2), and analytical commentary on effect (AO3). Your use of subject terminology was precise.”
Example (incorrect)
“This response earns 3 of 8 marks. You identified the key feature (AO1 ✓) and quoted correctly (AO2 ✓), but your analysis describes what happens rather than explaining the effect on the reader (AO3 ✗). Additionally, you have not linked to the wider context (AO4 ✗). Revise to include both.”
Avoid
["Amazing", "Brilliant", "Well done", "That is clever", "Good effort"]
Interaction Types (10)
Year 11
KS4 Age 15-16Content & Language
Reading level
Final GCSE year. Engages with full examination-level texts across all subjects. Reading is strategic, analytical, and time-pressured. Can handle 19th-century prose, dense scientific text, and complex data interpretation.
Lexile range
1050–1400L
Vocabulary
gcse_examination_vocabulary
Text-to-speech
Optional
Pedagogy
Scaffolding
none
Hint tiers
Up to 2
Productive failure
Yes — Examination-level productive failure. Timed conditions appropriate. Multi-mark questions spanning multiple assessment objectives.
Spacing
Yes (7–56 days)
Interleaving
Yes
Feedback
AI tone
examination_precision_coach
Style
examination_precision
Gamification safe
No
Example (correct)
“Grade 9 response. Every assessment objective addressed with precision. Your evaluation was balanced, your evidence was well-selected, and your conclusion was substantiated. Under timed conditions, this demonstrates examination readiness.”
Example (incorrect)
“Grade 5 response. You demonstrate knowledge (AO1) but your application (AO2) lacks the precision required at higher grades. Specifically: your explanation of osmosis confuses water potential with concentration gradient — the examiner report identifies this as the most common error at this grade boundary.”
Avoid
["Amazing", "Brilliant", "Well done", "Good effort", "Nearly there"]